Friday, March 30, 2012

Computer Chips In School Uniforms... What's Next?


Here's an excerpt from an interesting story published on March 22nd and written by Stahn Lehman of Associated Press called; "Locator chips keep track of students in Brazil".

SAO PAULO (AP) — Grade-school students in a northeastern Brazilian city are using uniforms embedded with locator chips that help alert parents if they're cutting classes, the city's education secretary said Thursday.

Twenty thousand students in 25 of Vitoria da Conquista's 213 public schools started using T-shirts with chips earlier this week, secretary Coriolano Moraes said by telephone.
By 2013, all of the city's 43,000 public school students, aged 4 to 14, will be using the chip-embedded T-shirts, he added.

Radio frequency chips in "intelligent uniforms" let a computer know when children enter school and it sends a text message to their cell phones. Parents are also alerted if kids don't show up 20 minutes after classes begin with the following message: "Your child has still not arrived at school."

"We noticed that many parents would bring their children to school but would not see if they actually entered the building because they always left in a hurry to get to work on time," Moraes said in a telephone interview. "They would always be surprised when told of the number times their children skipped class.

After a student skips classes three times parents will be asked to explain the absences. If they fail to do so, the school may notify authorities, Moares said. The city government invested $670,000 to design, test and make the microchipped T-shirts, he said.

The chips, similar to those used to track pets in many countries, are placed underneath each school's coat-of-arms or on one of the sleeves below a phrase that says: "Education does not transform the world. Education changes people and people transform the world."



I wonder what's going to happen when the students who really want to skip school decide to carry a change of clothing? :-) After spending $670,000 to bring this bright idea to fruition, what's the next step in the evolution of this technology? I have an idea. Since it works so well for pets why not put the chips in the actual students? That way, they can't possibly skip school.

Also, they can't get lost or be kidnapped without notice. Like we discovered last week, if Nokia has their way maybe it can also be linked to their cellphones and act as a Bluetooth device. Why stop there? You can put their medical information just in case they have a medical emergency. You can also put their banking information in case their wallets are lost or stolen. Then why not put their personal identification while you're at it? If it works well for pets it should work well for students and if it works well for students why not try it on everyone?

Revelation 13:15-17(NLT) - He was then permitted to give life to this statue so that it could speak. Then the statue of the beast commanded that anyone refusing to worship it must die. He required everyone—small and great, rich and poor, free and slave—to be given a mark on the right hand or on the forehead. And no one could buy or sell anything without that mark, which was either the name of the beast or the number representing his name.

Maybe I'm reading too much into this. Maybe I'm not. Computer Chips In School Uniforms. Bluetooth devices embedded under your skin.. What's Next?

Friday, March 23, 2012

Brain-Computer Interfaces in US Military and Nokia's Vibrating Tattoo



Current state-of-the-art neuroscience, including new forms of brain scanning, brain–computer interfaces (BCIs), and neuromodulation, is being tapped for warfighter enhancement, deception detection, and other cutting-edge military applications to serve national security interests. 

The super-power status of The United States is currently being held in place by its large economy and unmatched military strength. However, the economic gap with the rest of the world continues to shrink and the list of enemies continues to grow. Therefore, they've chosen to out-think instead of outspend or outnumber the competition.

Luke 14:31-32(NKJV) - Or what king, going to make war against another king, does not sit down first and consider whether he is able with ten thousand to meet him who comes against him with twenty thousand? Or else, while the other is still a great way off, he sends a delegation and asks conditions of peace.



Here's an excerpt from an article I read earlier this week called "Military-Funded Brain Science Sparks Controversy" by Charles Choi of Live Science.

Brain research and associated advances such as brain-machine interfaces that are funded by the U.S. military and intelligence communities raise profound ethical concerns, caution researchers who cite the potentially lethal applications of such work and other consequences.

Rapid advances in neuroscience made over the last decade have many dual-use applications of both military and civilian interest. Researchers who receive military funding — with the U.S. Department of Defense spending more than $350 million on neuroscience in 2011 — may not fully realize how dangerous their work might be, say scientists in an essay published online today (March 20) in the open-access journal PLoS Biology.

For instance, a brain-computer interface was used by a monkey to remotely control a walking robot in 2007. However, such interfaces could help people operate weapons, robotic exoskeletons, killer drones and other machines while sheltered from the reality of combat and its deadly consequences, said bioethicist Jonathan Moreno at the University of Pennsylvania, author of "Mind Wars: Brain Research and National Defense" (Dana Press, 2006).

"The question about brain-machine interfaces is whether we are continuing to lower the bar for conflict," Moreno told InnovationNewsDaily. "Certainly there are people in the armed forces and in policy who find the distancing of war fighters from combat disconcerting."

Other research can enhance or suppress brain activity of soldiers on the battlefield with so-called neuromodulation technologies. For instance, so-called transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial pulsed ultrasound could, in principle, apply magnetic fields or ultrasound pulses on the brain to reduce fatigue and mental trauma as well as improve mood, attention, learning and memory.

If you want to know what's really going on, read the research essay published three days ago called "Neuroscience, Ethics, and National Security: The State of the Art" by Tennison MN and Moreno JD. It will blow your mind.

Here's a sample;

DARPA's Augmented Cognition (AugCog) program sought to find ways to use neurological information gathered from warfighters to modify their equipment accordingly. For example, the “cognitive cockpit” concept involved recording a pilot's brain activity to customize the cockpit to that individual's needs in real time, from selecting the least burdened sensory organ for communicating information to prioritizing informational needs and eliminating distractions [7]. Although the Augmented Cognition moniker (and funding mechanism) seem to have been dropped, its spirit lives on in other DARPA projects. For example, the Cognitive Technology Threat Warning System is developing portable binoculars that convert subconscious, neurological responses to danger into consciously available information [8]. Such a system could reduce the information-processing burden on warfighters, helping them to identify and respond to areas of interest in the visual field more quickly.
Tennison MN, Moreno JD (2012) Neuroscience, Ethics, and National Security: The State of the Art. PLoS Biol 10(3): e1001289. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001289


Now let's take this to another level with Part 2 of today's blog. Take a look at the following scripture and think about it a little.

Revelation 13:15-17(NLT) - He was then permitted to give life to this statue so that it could speak. Then the statue of the beast commanded that anyone refusing to worship it must die. He required everyone—small and great, rich and poor, free and slave—to be given a mark on the right hand or on the forehead. And no one could buy or sell anything without that mark, which was either the name of the beast or the number representing his name.

Doesn't it sound quite futuristic? First, it talks about Synthetic Life then it talks about a special mark which we are yet to fully understand. Apparently, not only will it be symbolic but it will be used to communicate personal information. In fact, it may possibly involve some type of mind control since each person who takes the mark will lose autonomy over his/her soul (mind, will, emotions). Maybe it's just me but what I recently discovered proves that the technology is already available.

Yesterday, CNN Money published an article by Chris Boyette called "Nokia eyes tattoos that talk to your phone." Here's some of what he had to say;

Nobody likes a loud ringtone, and if you don't have your phone close by, you might not feel it vibrate. Finnish-based Nokia has a potential solution, with just one catch: You need to get a tattoo.

In a recent filing to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Nokia (NOK) described a concept for using magnetic ink embedded in the skin to interact with a specific electromagnetic field put off by mobile phones. The interaction would generate a perceivable stimulus when the ink registers "an alert of an incoming message, a phone call, an alarm." In other words, your tattoo will vibrate with your phone.

Check this out from Vlad Bobleanta who provided more details at Unwired View;

In the first described embodiment of the patent, you’d wear a sort of material that’s attachable to the skin. On your forearm, for example. This material can do two things: detect a magnetic field, and emit a vibration.

The material could be paired with a phone, for example, like Bluetooth accessories are paired to electronics. The phone, however, would have to be capable of emitting varying magnetic fields.

So then, for example, when someone calls that phone, it will send out a specific magnetic field. The material will detect that, and will start vibrating in a certain pattern. That pattern could be different according to who’s calling, or it could be different according to what exactly is happening on the phone (a phone call, text message, and so on).

For this to work, the phone would have to send out a different magnetic field for each action, because the material would associate a different type of vibration with each kind of magnetic field it detects. The vibrations would happen by magnetically manipulating the material.

But wait, there’s more. What about using an actual tattoo instead of that material attached to your skin? Yes, Nokia has thought about that too.

The tattoo would be applied using ferromagnetic inks. The ink material would first be exposed to high temperatures to demagnetize it. Then the tattoo would be applied. You’ll apparently be able to choose the actual image you want as the tattoo. The procedure is identical to that of getting a ‘normal’ tattoo – only the ink is special.

After the tattoo has been applied, you’ll need to magnetize it. That means bringing the tattooed area in the close proximity of an external magnet, and going “several times over this magnet to magnetize the image material again”. The tattoo will then have enhanced sensitivity towards external alternating magnet fields, and will basically function the same way the aforementioned material attached to your skin did. Only in a more permanent fashion, so to speak.
- "Nokia is looking into haptic tattoos to help you feel who’s calling" by Vlad Bobleanta on 15 Mar 12

Now if you think we're making this up go to the US Patent Office website for yourself and look it up here. If you can't find it enter the search terms; "nokia AND haptic and feedback and ferromagnetic." This is some interesting stuff. I just have one word to to say about all of it; "WOW!"

Revelation 22:20(KJV) - He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.

Sunday, March 4, 2012

News Flash: Atheism Is Not A Science!



Psalm 8:1-9(MSG) - God, brilliant Lord, yours is a household name. Nursing infants gurgle choruses about you; toddlers shout the songs That drown out enemy talk, and silence atheist babble. I look up at your macro-skies, dark and enormous, your handmade sky-jewelry, Moon and stars mounted in their settings. Then I look at my micro-self and wonder, Why do you bother with us? Why take a second look our way? Yet we've so narrowly missed being gods, bright with Eden's dawn light. You put us in charge of your handcrafted world, repeated to us your Genesis-charge, Made us lords of sheep and cattle, even animals out in the wild, Birds flying and fish swimming, whales singing in the ocean deeps. God, brilliant Lord, your name echoes around the world. (emphasis mine)

Why does God even bother with us? Especially those of us who shake our fists in the air at Him in opposition. Do we really believe we can match His power? Thankfully, God is merciful and because of His love He winks at our ignorance. He loves human beings and values our lives. He loves Christians. He loves Muslims. He loves Hindus. He loves agnostics. He loves atheists. It's because of His love that He continues to reach out to us but even God's unlimited love does not override rebellious hearts.

Last Saturday, this was quite evident during what turned out to be an intense debate on "Science vs Religion" with an atheist on Chris Cross Radio out of NJ. After I was introduced by the host at approximately 99 minutes into the 120 minute program I was asked to explain the premise of my book, Faith Science. So I gave a little teaser connecting Genesis 1:1 and The Big Bang Theory. 

This triggered an immediate response from one of the atheists on the panel. He claimed to have once been a Christian who read The Bible three times. He tried to portray himself as being someone of superior intelligence and for almost 99 minutes he was successfully dominating the discussion before I entered. Then I called his bluff. Not only was he unable to question the science behind my statements he also exposed his limited understanding of the scriptures. Instead of giving you the "play by play" you can listen to it for yourself from approximately the 99th minute of the recorded broadcast here


The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines an atheist as "one who believes that there is no deity." Simply put, atheism is a belief system that is based on the principle that God doesn't exist. That is what atheism is. Here is what it is not. Atheism is not the highest level of human intelligence. It also is not built on scientific research or intellectual accomplishment. It is not a direct result of mental ascent. It is a belief system and therefore a choice. Atheists choose to believe that there is no God and whatever reasons they provide for that choice is up to them. Atheism is not the final conclusion of The Scientific Method. Atheism is not a science!

Psalm 14:1(KJV) - The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.

Here's an excerpt from Faith Science which questions the assertion that atheism is built on science and that atheists are somehow intellectually superior to anyone who believes in God.

From Faith Science;
Five Prominent Christian Scientists in History

1. Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627): Pioneer of the Scientific Method

The Scripture saith, The fool hath said in his heart, there is no God; it is not said, The fool hath thought in his heart; so as he rather saith it, by rote to himself, as that he would have, than that he can thoroughly believe it, or be persuaded of it. For none deny, there is a God, but those, for whom it maketh that there were no God. It appeareth in nothing more, that atheism is rather in the lip, than in the heart of man, than by this; that atheists will ever be talking of that their opinion, as if they fainted in it, within themselves, and would be glad to be strengthened, by the consent of others.

—Francis Bacon, Of Atheism (Essays of Francis Bacon)


The scientific method defines science as we know it. So I can’t think of anyone who qualifies more to accept the title of an accomplished scientist than the man who proposed its definition in the first place. Bacon clearly despised atheism and did not hold anything back in his essay Of Atheism. I specifically chose this quote because he demonstrated his use of the Bible in approaching the concept of atheism.

He quoted from Psalm 14:1 and expounded on the scripture just like a preacher. In essence, he said that atheists can’t really believe what they say about God. People who claim there is no God know the truth in their hearts. They have no excuse, like Paul said in Romans 1:18–23. They just talk off their heads and feel better about their position if they could get some support from others.

2. Johannes Kepler (1571–1630): Kepler’s Laws of Planetary Motion

I wanted to become a theologian; for a long time I was restless. Now, however, behold how through my effort God is being celebrated in astronomy. 
—Johannes Kepler, 1595 Letter to Michael Maestlin, mathematics professor and Kepler’s mentor


HyperPhysics hosted by the Department of Physics and Astronomy of Georgia State University simply defines Kepler’s Laws as:

• The Law of Orbits: All planets move in elliptical orbits, with the sun at one focus.
• The Law of Areas: A line that connects a planet to the sun sweeps out equal areas in equal times.
• The Law of Periods: The square of the period of any planet is proportional to the cube of the semimajor axis of its orbit.

Note: Kepler’s laws were derived for orbits around the sun, but they apply to satellite orbits as well.

While the general consensus was that orbits were circular, Kepler proposed that they were elliptical. His laws approximated the motion of planets around the sun and became building blocks of modern astronomy. Even as a respected astronomer, he was quoted as saying, “Nothing in the world was created by God without a plan.” Kepler’s testimony in his letter to Maestlin is similar to mine. I also wanted to become a theologian but pursued physics and structural engineering. Now, God is being celebrated through my life.

3. Robert Boyle (1627–1691): Boyle’s Law

When with bold telescopes I survey the old and newly discovered stars and planets that adorn the upper region of the world; and when with excellent microscopes I discern in otherwise invisible objects … nature’s curious workmanship; and when, in a word … I study the book of nature … I find myself oftentimes reduced to exclaim with the Psalmist, How manifold are thy Works O Lord? In Wisdom hast thou made them all! And when I have been losing myself in admiration of what I understand not, but enough to admire, and not to comprehend; I am often obliged to interrupt or break off my enquiries, by applying to the works of God’s creation the expression … O the depth of the Riches, both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments, and his way untraceable. 
—Robert Boyle, Seraphick Love: Some Motives and Incentives to the Love of God


Frank Wattenberg from the Department of Mathematics at Montana State University said the following of Boyle’s Law:

Boyle’s Law involves a relationship between three properties of a gas in a container: the volume of the container (denoted V), the pressure of the gas (denoted P), the temperature of the gas (denoted T).

Boyle’s Law states: PV = kT where k is a constant, or Pressure * Volume = Constant * Temperature

The value of the constant k depends on the units used for the other quantities, but once the units are fixed, k is also fixed. When any one of the quantities V, P, or T is changed, one or two of the others must change so that the equation above still holds.

Robert Boyle developed his scientific and religious philosophies simultaneously. He is described as one of the founders of modern chemistry. In college, I learned Boyle’s law as the inversely proportional relationship between absolute pressure and the volume of gas. It’s used to understand the behavior of gases in balloons, syringes, and even human lungs. It’s so commonly used that we hardly acknowledge it. With his extensive understanding of science came a great respect for God.

4. Michael Faraday (1791–1867): Faraday’s Law, Electromagnetic Fields

The Christian who is taught of God … finds his guide in the Word of God … and looks for no assurance beyond what the Word can give him. The Christian religion is a revelation, and that revelation is the Word of God. No revival and no temporal teaching comes between it and him. He who is taught of the Holy Spirit needs no crowd and no revival to teach him; if he stands alone he is fully taught. 
—Selected Exhortations Delivered to Various Churches of Christ by the Late Michael Faraday, Wm. Buchanan, John M. Baxter, and Alex Moir, James Rorie, editor, (Dundee: John Leng and Co., Ltc., 1910)


HyperPhysics hosted by the Department of Physics and Astronomy of Georgia State University simply defines Faraday’s Law as: Any change in the magnetic environment of a coil of wire will cause a voltage (emf ) to be “induced” in the coil. No matter how the change is produced, the voltage will be generated. The change could be produced by changing the magnetic field strength, moving a magnet toward or away from the coil, moving the coil into or out of the magnetic field, rotating the coil relative to the magnet, etc.

Faraday’s law is a fundamental relationship which comes from Maxwell’s equations. It serves as a succinct summary of the ways a voltage (or emf ) may be generated by a changing magnetic environment. The induced emf in a coil is equal to the negative of the rate of change of magnetic flux times the number of turns in the coil. It involves the interaction of charge with magnetic field.

Michael Faraday turned the scientific world upside down. His development of electromagnetic rotary devices made electricity usable in technology. He’s been called the best experimentalist in the history of science, and it’s said that on Albert Einstein’s study wall was his photo. The farad used to measure capacitance and the Faraday constant used to measure charge were named after him. He’s even credited for developing the Bunsen burner. How did a man with such an amazing scientific track record embrace Christian beliefs? The same way any other person can. When properly understood in context, they do not have to contradict each other.

5. Lord Kelvin (1824–1907): absolute zero, First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics

Science positively affirms Creative Power. It is not in dead matter that we live and move and have our being, but in the creating and directing power which science compels us to accept as an article of belief. We cannot escape from that conclusion, when we study the physics and dynamics of living and dead matter all around. Modern biologists are coming, I believe, once more to a firm acceptance of something beyond mere gravitational, chemical, and physical forces; and that unknown thing is a vital principle. We have an unknown object put before us in science. In thinking of that object we are all agnostics. We only know God in His works, but we are absolutely forced by science to believe with perfect confidence in a Directive Power—in an influence other than physical, or dynamical, or electrical forces.

—Lord Kelvin (William Thomson); Vote of thanks from Lord Kelvin following a course of lectures on “Christian Apologetics” given at University College, London in May, 1903 by Rev. Professor Henslow.


The next time you consider units of temperature, remember that Celsius and Fahrenheit are just two of them. Named after Lord Kelvin, absolute zero or 0 Kelvin is defined as -273.15°C and -459.67°F. Close to that temperature, quantum effects like superconductivity and super fluidity are exhibited by matter. This is basically what is known as the absolute minimum temperature. Lord Kelvin, the same elite scientist who proposed this measure, was a staunch defender of the Christian faith.

These five scientists—Bacon, Kepler, Boyle, Faraday, and Kelvin— are just a small representation of the vast number of Christians in science throughout history. It’s undeniable that the practice of science cannot negate the practice of Christian faith and vice versa.

Thursday, March 1, 2012

The Power of Music: Intersecting Science, Art & Spirituality



Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life. 
Ludwig van Beethoven






What's the connection between music and our understanding of science? Observe how Theoretical Physicist Brian Greene, an expert in String Theory uses this connection to explain Albert Einstein's "Theory of Everything."

Albert Einstein dreamed of finding what he called a Unified Theory. By that he meant a single idea, a single principle, maybe even a single equation that might describe everything in the universe. He worked long and hard many decades to try to find the theory and he never did. Since his passing many physicists have taken up where he left off, and many of us believe that an approach called String Theory may be the Unified Theory that he was looking for. And the basic idea of the unified description of all matter is pretty straightforward. If you take any piece of material, say a piece of wood, cut it in half, cut it in half again, keep on cutting it to ever smaller pieces, the basic question is what’s the smallest piece that you get to?

What is the finest uncuttable constituent? Now we all know if you cut fine enough you get molecules, if you cut them up, you get atoms, if you cut them up even further you get other particles, electrons going around the nucleus with neutrons and protons, even though the neutrons and protons are smaller entities called quarks. The conventional idea stopped there. String Theory comes along and says “There may be one more layer of structure: inside an electron, inside a quark, inside any particle you have heard of, according to these ideas, is a little tiny filament. Looks like a tiny little string, that’s why it’s called String Theory, and the little strings can vibrate in different patterns.”

So the idea is that, according to this theory an electron can be a string vibrating in one pattern. You can call it a middle C if you want, by the musical analogy, a quark could be a string vibrating at a different pattern like an A. So the difference between one particle and another is simply the note that its string is playing. And this is the unified description that this theory puts forward: everything can be reduced to the notes these fundamental strings are playing. Now that’s metaphorical. There’s math behind this, that allows us to see all of the key elements of physics can find a home in this description, but in a nutshell that’s what this theory says.



What we play is life. 
Louis Armstrong


What is music? The Merriam Webster Dictionary defines music as "the science or art of ordering tones or sounds in succession, in combination, and in temporal relationships to produce a composition having unity and continuity." It then defines sound as "mechanical radiant energy that is transmitted by longitudinal pressure waves in a material medium (as air) and is the objective cause of hearing." In essence, music is the science or art that defines the ordered transfer of energy from the source to its recipient. Therefore, on the most fundamental level, there is power in music.

Education in music is most sovereign because more than anything else rhythm and harmony find their way to the innermost soul and take strongest hold upon it. 
Plato

The Bible says in Genesis 2:7; "And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." It then says in 1 Corinthians 15:45; "And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul." In the Greek language, the word used by The Apostle Paul for human soul is the breath of life. In other words, God breathed into man and then man was able to breathe on his own. The soul is the center of thought, decision and emotion. It's the essence of our humanity.




Here's a very interesting story from The Bible which demonstrates the power of music to impact the human soul.
1 Samuel 16:14-22(NLT) - Now the Spirit of the LORD had left Saul, and the LORD sent a tormenting spirit that filled him with depression and fear. 15 Some of Saul’s servants said to him, “A tormenting spirit from God is troubling you. 16 Let us find a good musician to play the harp whenever the tormenting spirit troubles you. He will play soothing music, and you will soon be well again.” 17 “All right,” Saul said. “Find me someone who plays well, and bring him here.” 18 One of the servants said to Saul, “One of Jesse’s sons from Bethlehem is a talented harp player. Not only that—he is a brave warrior, a man of war, and has good judgment. He is also a fine-looking young man, and the LORD is with him.” 19 So Saul sent messengers to Jesse to say, “Send me your son David, the shepherd.” 20 Jesse responded by sending David to Saul, along with a young goat, a donkey loaded with bread, and a wineskin full of wine. 21 So David went to Saul and began serving him. Saul loved David very much, and David became his armor bearer. 22 Then Saul sent word to Jesse asking, “Please let David remain in my service, for I am very pleased with him.” 23 And whenever the tormenting spirit from God troubled Saul, David would play the harp. Then Saul would feel better, and the tormenting spirit would go away.

Saul was troubled by an evil spirit and his deliverance came through a novel medium, music! Why was music the only suggestion given to him? Obviously, they understood the power of music to heal his ailment. Since hindsight is 20-20, we can all now marvel at their brilliance. Believe it or not, this was an early form of what is now called "Music Therapy."

Here's what Music Therapy expert, Concetta Tomaino, D.A., MT-BC, LCAT, has to say;

One of the reasons, and one of the exciting reasons, why music therapy has so much promise for people with neurological conditions is that music accesses the networks in the brain in a complementary faction (fashion) or differently than the function that a person has lost. And what I mean by that is we can stimulate the timing mechanisms, we can stimulate word finding ability, we can stimulate recognition memory, even short-term memory function through using music in a specific way that makes available to these patients function in the brain that’s still there but maybe they can’t get at independently because of the inhibition that has taken place due to their brain injury.

So music is an enriched sensory stimulus that allows for, I believe, the disinhibition of some of the inhibited function that has been lost in these individuals. And by stimulating these complementary or parallel networks, we see this type of ability come back.

Source: Music Therapy for Neurological Conditions

Music can be used to explain the scientific foundation of life! Music transfers energy! Music is a universal language! Music can bring deliverance from evil! Music can heal! Armed with this wisdom, tonight we begin in Atlanta, GA what may grow into a very important series of discussions on the music industry. Since music is so powerful, the current state of music in our culture is a major priority. If you can't join us in person, you can join us online.








If I can write the songs of the nations, I don't care who writes the laws. 
Plato